Assign task to more than one person
Currently you can only assign a to-do to one person or every person.
It would be great to be able to assign a to-do to 2< people.

It is now available on all paid plans. All existing paying customers (as of 15 Nov 2021) will have to enable it. This is because not all project managers are fans of shared tasks responsibility and we do not want to mess with our customer’s current setup.
All users upgrading to paid plans will have it enabled by default but can easily disable it too.
-
Anouk M.Renaud commented
Anyone who is assigned to it, since it is teamwork.
-
Igor commented
Who should be able to edit, change status of a such TODO from your point of view. Person who created it or anyone who is assigned to it?
-
Stratboy commented
Hi Igor, here is another use case: I'm building a website. On freedcamp there are me, my client (say Diego) and a web marketing pro (say Giulia) that is working both for me and my client.
I need texts and images. Fabio has some, but Giulia wants to change some of them. Or at least it's just what I remember from a past meeting. So probably Fabio needs both some texts and some photos from Giulia. Also, in case that Giulia wants to change texts, he must wait for the translations to have them.
So, as a 'manager' of the job, I need to notify both that I need contents but that they should speak to each other and colaborate to collect the right contents before giving me. It's not a Giulia's job, nor a Fabio's job. It's a both job.
This 'assign to more than one person' problem is a common problem I saw even in other tools like this. Maybe theoretically, from the 'right' interaction design point of view it's wrong, but the practice says that too much people is asking this feature, as well as (off topic but the same issue--) the subtasks one.
-
Anouk M.Renaud commented
Hi Igor, thanks for the fast reply, I really appreciate. Here is my concrete case : I'm working in a committee of 6 people. We have to write a politic about our committee. It's too complicated to work on this all together, so we decided in a meeting that another person and I will meet separately to do it. I created a to-do for this task and I would like to put both our names, so we could see it on our respective dashboard. All the committee would also see who do what with a broader perspective. As you see, the point is not to make a to-do list and let people pick the task they want, but more to have a centralized list so that people don't forget what they have to do.
I could create a temporary group and put the another person and I in it, and then assign the task to that "group", but I think it would just be easier to drag and drop two names...
-
Igor commented
Hi Anouk,
Does it mean everyone should do this task like 'Brush your teeth' - so you do not really care who will pick it up as everyone should or 'Call a client' - you do not want a few people to call that client, right? Or ... you want a person who is actually taking responsibility to remove others?
For me assigning to a group makes sense - letting a group to decide actual person or tasks where everyone assigned needs to complete but who will mark this task as completed in this case..Can you email me or post here a good use case please?
Regards,
Igor -
Anouk M.Renaud commented
I would give all my votes to that feature if it was still open. I'm on a organization committee in a cooperative and we work in teams without having any roles, just trying to resolve a problem after another (and there are new ones every day!), creating temporary co-working for specifics problems. I think it's still really relevant to have the ability to assign to more than 1 person, so every person on the to-do can see it on his dashboard or when he sorts the to-do's with "assigned to" filter. It would be more instinctive than to just notify people or to always create new groups of people, even if this eventuality is a step in the good way! Thanks for your work :)
-
Stratboy commented
HI! The subcription feature is a viable workaround but I think it would be best one can explicitly see the assigments. So instead of creating users subgroups, simply the ability to drag/drop more than only one user to the task would be just enough. And of course a checkbox list on the edit panel as well (by the way, the edit panel should be called edit, not comments ;))
The main 2 reasons for that are 1. visual clarity and 2. functional clarity: with this I mean that should be more clear if a task is intented to be worked out by more than one person. It's not the same as assign to one and notify the others (sounds much like a simple CC).
-
We have just added an option to subscribe to a TODO more than one person (it is assigned to one person but you can notify more than one person).
Please let us know if actual assignment to more than one person is required. Keep in mind that we are planning to add groups and ability to assign to a group in future too.
-
Carolina commented
Great!! Thank u!!
-
Michael commented
Hello, i just stumbled upon your site this morning while searching for a cloud based project manager. We too would like to assign a task or to-do to more than one person. Mainly because we have teams of multiple people (usually 2-3) and need a way to assign a task to that team instead of individuals of that team.
-
We are constantly asking people to tell us why do they need to assign multiple people to the same task. Here is one of the answers: "I was trying to assign 2 - 3 people to a single 'To do's task where they have different role to perform. True that I can assign 2 - 3 separate 'To-do's for them. But I have a constraint where I can't (impossible) further decomposed the 'TO do's due to the local requirements."
-
We are also adding Subscribe module you see in Discussions to TODOs so you can assign one person and subscribe others.
-
@Miranda thank you for sending us the use case. As a temporary measure I'll suggest you create a to-do group for each group of students. If you'd like you can list their names in the description of the To-Do group.
-
Miranda Voss commented
Angel, I am using Freedcamp to manage a number of service learning projects for students dispersed over several rural sites in teams of 2-4. I would like to be able to assign the site-specific task to those few students only, while still allowing others to check in and see what other groups are doing.
-
This is a note for people following this feature. Please give us some use cases where one task needs to be assigned to two people.
-
Brad G Reynolds commented
sounds like a decent feature although I agree with Angel that multiple assignees to a task is not considered a good practice. Other option is to duplicate the task for each person. That would indicate that the task must be done multiple times. If it only has to be done once, then one person should take primary responsibility for it and be the assignee.
-
Jorge McDonald commented
Group assignment: define groups of individuals within a project and then assign to them the task/todo. This would improve it, does not necessarily has to be "role-based".
-
Just an update about this feature and the possibilities we are considering.
First of all as seen in most other Project Management systems there will always be one person the task is assigned to officially.
However, when our module/plugins become available an extension would be ability to add more "Roles" like Task Lead and Co-Asignee. This way we can still have a clear assigned to person, but still allow to include others in on the task.
-
Lam Woon Cherk commented
Please develop this feature! This is very much needed. :)
-
Anonymous commented
Could really use this feature if it was available!