Settings and activity
-
9 votes
Hi Steve,
Thanks for posting. Great idea – just need to redesign filters so we add this option without doubling amount of options in each filter category.
Cheers,
IgorAn error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment 
Josh
commented
Wow. I'm surprised that this doesn't have more love. Here's another use case for negative filters: saved calendars.
This software is awesome. I want to use it for my internal projects as well as my client projects. I would love to save searched that only return my client projects, events, etc.
Option 1: update all of my saved searches when I add a client.
Option 2: save the searches as not "my internal team" and it's good foreverJosh
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesJosh
supported this idea
·
-
1,167 votes
Implemented one of two identified user cases – https://blog.freedcamp.com/2020/03/19/tasks-multiple-people-need-to-complete/
Josh
supported this idea
·
-
189 votes
We have two use cases here.
1. Making is super easy to work with clients. Clients can see only Discussion and Tasks which specifically marked as visible to them. Rest is not visible to them
2. Allowing true privacy – concept described by Caroline. Once this mode is enabled users can create private tasks and decide who they want to share it with.
@Caroline – I assume project and project group administrators should be able to see private tasks. Right?
NEW UPDATEProbably we should move Private Tasks and Private Discussions into a separate add-on which is not available by default.
We have requests for private tasks and we have requests for disabling privacy – when a teacher in a school does not want students to create private tasks at all.
I assume functionality similar to Private Discussions we already have in Freedcamp is what you are after.
OLD UPDATE…
Josh
supported this idea
·
-
1,158 votes
Hi All,
I updated the concept and published http://bit.ly/2uvRsKy
Please feel free to join FB community and post your feedback here or on FB – here is a direct link – http://bit.ly/38ZfmNG
Cheers,
IgorJosh
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Josh
commented
I can understand the idea that Testing might be a task (subtask) and not a status. But there's a world of difference between No Progress and Blocked (No Progress Possible). It seems like adding Blocked is a lot simpler than adding task dependencies.
Any chance there's an update on this?
Another use case: filtering a task list by date. I can pick today OR in the past OR OR OR. And I can only pick one.
I can't pick today or in the past (which means any task that could be worked on). But if I could select NOT IN THE FUTURE for the filter I would easily see everything that matters.